IJARP
SJIF(2020): 5.702

International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications

High Quality Publications & World Wide Indexing!

Comparison Of Activity Limitation And Participation Restriction Status Of Individuals With Right And Left Cerebral Hemisphere Stroke

Volume 2 - Issue 12, December 2018 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Author(s)
Amandeep Singh, Rajneet Kaur Sahni, Harpreet Singh
Keywords
Activity Limitation, Participation Restriction, Quality of Life; Stroke, Cerebral Hemisphere
Abstract
Stroke has become one of the leading cause of mortality and long term disability in developing World. Many advances have been made in Stroke prevention and management; however, stroke continues to be a prevalent and burdensome condition affecting individual’s family and society at large. Large quantity of people are surviving and returning to community. In humans both cerebral hemispheres are important for purposeful movement, which are required in activities of daily living and participation in community. Keeping this in mind the purpose of the study is to find out whether hemispheric difference reflects measure of level of activity limitation and participation restriction as outcomes in stroke patients.
References
[1] Delaney, G & Potter, P 1993, ‘Disability post stroke’, In: Teasell RW (ed). Long- Term Consequences of Stroke. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, Hanley & Belfus Inc, Philadelphia, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 27- 42.

[2] Rai, Rk, Arora, L, Sambyal, S & Arora, R 2014, 'Efficacy of trunk rehabilitation & balance training on trunk control balance and gait in post stroke hemiplegic patients : A Randomised control trial', Journal of Nursing and Health Science, vol. 3 , No. 3, pp. 27-31.

[3] Stucki, G, Cieza, A, Ewert, T, Kostanjsek, N, Chatterji, S, Ustun & TB 2002, 'Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical practice', Journal of Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 24, pp. 281–282.

[4] Loeb, ME, Eide, AH, & Mont, D 2008, ‘Approaching the measurement of disability prevelance: The case of Zambia’, European Journal of Disability Research, vol. 2, pp. 32-43.

[5] Hoenig, H, Horner, RD, Duncan, PW, Clipp, E & Hamilton, B 1999, ‘New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research’, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol.36, no.1, pp. 19-31.

[6] Rhoda, A, Mpofu, R, & Weerdt, W 2011, ‘Activity limitations of patients with stroke attending outpatient facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa’, South African Journal of Physiotherapy, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 16-22.

[7] Scheepers, VPM, Ketelaar, M, Van De Port, IGL, Visser-Meily, JMA, & Lindeman, E 2007, ‘Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’, Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 221-230.

[8] Joseph, C & Rhoda, A 2013, ‘Activity limitation and factors influencing functional outcomes of patients with stroke following rehabilitation at a specialised facility in the Western Cape’, African Health Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 646-654.

[9] Pandian, JD & Sudhan, P 2013, 'Stroke Epidemiology and Stroke Care Services in India', Journal of Stroke, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 128- 134.

[10] Abubakar, SA & Isezuo, SA 2012, ‘Health Related Quality of Life of Stroke Survivors: Experience of a Stroke Unit’, International Journal of Biomedical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183-187.

[11] Ishii, F, Matsukawa, N , Horiba, M, Wada, I , Yamanaka, T, Hattori, M, Yamawaki T, & Ojik, K 2009, ‘Disability of weight shift toward non paretic leg in stroke patients with non-dominant hemisphere’, Nagoya Medical Journal, vol. 50, pp. 67- 76.

[12] `Chau, JPC, Thompson, DR, Twinn, S, Chang, AM & Woo, J 2009, ‘Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: A path analyses’, Biomed Central Neurology, vol. 9, no. 49.

[13] Mayo, NE, Dauphinee, sw, Cote, R, Durcan, L & Carlton, J 2002, ' Activity,Participation, and Quality of Life 6 months poststroke', Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 83, pp. 1035–1042.

[14] Oldfield, RC 1971, 'the assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory’, Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, pp. 97–113.

[15] Sainburg, RL & Schaefer, SY 2004, ‘Interlimb Differences in Control of Movement Extent’, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 92, pp.1374-1383.


[16] Teasell, RW, Foley, NC, Bhogal, SK & Speechley, MR 2003, 'An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation', Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 10, pp. 29–58.

[17] Aho, K, Harmsen, P, Hatano, S, Smirnov, VE & Strasser, T 1980, ‘Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of WHO collaborative study’ Bulletin of World Health Organisation, vol. 58, pp. 113-130.

[18] Wade, D & Collin, C 1988, 'The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability?',Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, pp. 64–67.

[19] Jenkinson, C, Mant, J, Carter, J, Wade, D & Winner, S 2000, 'The London handicap scale: a re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation', Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 68, pp. 365–367.

[20] Kawashima, R, Matsumura, M, Sadato, N, Naito, E, Waki A, & Nakamura, S 1998, 'Regional cerebral blood flow changes in human brain related to ipsilateral and contralateral complex hand movements--a PET study’, European Journal of Neurosciences, vol. 10, pp. 2254-2260

[21] Kanase , SM & Vardarajulu, G 2014 , ‘Effect of task related training versus conventional training on walking performance s in post stroke patients’, International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2786- 2790.

[22] Voos, MC & Ribeiro do Valle, LE 2008, 'Comparative study on the relationship between stroke hemisphere and functional evolution in right- handed individuals’, Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113-20.

[23] Desrosiers, J, Bourbonnais, D, Noreau, L, Rochette, A, Bravo, G & Bourget, A 2005, 'Participation after Stroke Compared To Normal Ageing', Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 353-357.