IJARP Impact Factor(2018): 4.908

International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications!

Paper Details: Investigating The Teaching Methods Based On The Development Of Future Studies In The Higher Education In Afghanistan

Volume 3 - Issue 8, August 2019 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Mohammad Fawad Bayan
Higher education, Futures Studies, Curriculum, teaching.
Universities play have a key role in the sustainable development of countries and one of the most important responsibilities of them is the empowerment of students in different fields, including the identification of the future or future studies. The enhanced capacity of student futures can be advanced through education during the years of study, so one can claim that one of the important variables that can be the ability of future student studies to influence students is the quality of teaching and learning techniques. The purpose of this study was to investigate teaching methods based on the improvement of future studies in higher education in Afghanistan. This aim was conducted employing qualitative research methodology and using a strategy based on the data theory of the phenomena. In this regard, semi-structured interviews with 20 faculty members in the field of Humannities in public and private universities of Kabul were carried out using a purposeful approach and application of theoretical saturation criterion. To obtain the reliability and validity of the data from the participants, the review method and review of non-participating experts in the research were used. Then some concepts through three stages, open source coding, theoretical coding and selective coding were obtained. The used software were SPSS and LISREL and finally, 16 general categories were obtained. This article presents the findings of the study in the framework of the paradigmatic model including: causal conditions (4 categories), pivotal phenomenon (futures studies as a general approach to teaching), strategies (3 categories), fields (4 categories), interventional conditions (2 categories) and outcomes (2 categories).
[1]. Bell, W. (2011). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era: Values, Objectivity, and the Good Society. Transaction Publishers.

[2]. Bussey M. The Hidden Curriculum of Futures Studies Introducing the Futures Senses. World Future Review. 2016 Mar 1; 8(1):39-45.

[3]. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.

[4]. Freed PE, Mclaughlin DE. Future thinking: Preparing Nurses to Think for Tomorrow. Nurs Educ Perspec 2011; 32(3): 173-8.

[5]. Hicks, D. (2002) Lessons for the Future. The Missing Dimension in Education. NY and London: RoutledgeFalmer; Hicks, David.A Futures Perspective: Lessons from the school room. Sense Publishers Rotterdam, 2008.

[6]. Leung SF, Mok E, Wong D. (2008) the impact of assessment methods on the learning of nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today; 28(6).pp 711-724

[7]. Maroofi Y, Karami Z. Providence and futures study: A approach to curriculum development. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2015 Aug 11;7(3).

[8]. Masini EB. How to Teach Futures Studies: Some Experiences. J Futures Stud 2011; 15(4): 111 –20.

[9]. Parrish, D. R. (2016). Principles and a model for advancing futures studies and student focused. 2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (pp. 311 – 315). València, Spain: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.

[10]. Sardar Z. The Namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—what’s in a name? Futures 2010; 42(3): 177-84.

[11]. Siraj, Saedah. Ridhuan, Muhammad. Development of Future Curriculum via Futures Studies. US-China Education Review B 2 (2011), 226-236.

[12]. Slaughter, R. A. (1996). New Thinking for a New Millennium. London: Rutledge.

[13]. Slaughter, R. A. (2011). The Integral futures controversy. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 6(2), 105-111.

[14]. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for Grounded theory.Newbury park, CA: Sage

[15]. Strauss, Anselm and Carbin, J. (2011). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and Procedures for Grounded theory. Translated by Ibrahim Afshar. Tehran: Neyat Publishing.. [Persian]
[16]. Tonkaboni F, Masumi M. Development of Teaching Plan in the Curriculum of Medical Sciences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2016 Jul 3;15(7).

[17]. Tonkaboni F, Yousefy A, Keshtiaray N. Designing Objectives in Curriculum of Iran’s Higher Education Based on Development of Social Capital. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies. (2015). Vol.6, No.11, 7-26

[18]. Tonkaboni F, Yousefy A, Keshtiaray N. The Relationship between the Curriculum of Higher Education and Social Capital. Journal of Education and Training. 2013 Nov 30;1(1):39-47.

[19]. Wilson K, Fowler J. (2005) Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education; 30 (1). 87-101