International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications (2456-9992)

High Quality Publications & World Wide Indexing!

The Use Of Mental Models And Ill-Structured Problems In Determining Students’ Alternative Conceptions In Stoichiometry

Volume 2 - Issue 12, December 2018 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Norrie E. Gayeta
alternative conceptions, ill-structured problems, mental models, stoichiometry
This study determined the most common alternative conceptions of students in stoichiometry using mental models and ill-structured problems. Qualitative and quantitative research methods were used in the study with conceptual understanding test as the main data gathering instruments. Respondents were third year Bachelor of Secondary Education, Biological Science students. Frequency and percentage were the statistical tools applied to answer the question presented in the study. Results showed that students manifested alternative conception in illustrating model of certain chemical reactions, particularly the reactants of the reaction. Moreover there were inconsistency in the reasoning of the students on how chemical reactions takes place. There was an indication of misconception between atom and molecule among students. Students’ conceptions of atom and molecule were ambiguous, for the students, the two concepts could be used interchangeably. Participants also manifested alternative conception in balancing chemical equation, determining the limiting reactant and excess reactants, and finding the mass of the reacting compound. The study recommends to continuously diagnose students’ misconception in other science courses, and further study areas where alternative conceptions exist and identify teaching and assessment strategies to correct misconceptions.
[1]. R.W. Powell, J. C., & Trowbridge, L.W. Basic Goals of Science Education. Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall, 2010.

[2]. P. R. Harvard, Understanding Students Weaknesses. National Science Foundation. 2013

[3]. K. E. Brashier, http://www.worldcat. org/identifies/np-brashier. 2000

[4]. C. B. Lee & D. Jonassen, Fostering Conceptual Change with Technology. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd, 2013.

[5]. N. A. Branscombe, K. Castle, & A. G. Dorsey, Early Childhood Curriculum: A Constructivist Perspective. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.

[6]. H. D. Barke, S. Yitbarek., & A. Hazari, Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perception in Chemical Education. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.

[7]. C. J. Wenning “Levels of Inquiry Model Science Teaching: Learning Sequences to Lesson Plans” www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/Sample-learning-sequences.pdf. 2011.

[8]. D. A. Jacobsen, Methods for Teaching: Promoting Students Learning. 6th ed. USA: Prentice Hall, 2000.

[9]. S. Vosniadou, International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge, 2008.

[10]. J. D. Gobert, & A. Pallant, “Fostering Students’ Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7-22. 2004.

[11]. J. K. Gilbert, Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education. Netherlands: Springer, 2005.

[12]. N. J. Nersessian, Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. New York: Kluwer, 2008.

[13]. A. G. Harrison, & D. F. Treagust, “Learning about Atoms, Molecules and Chemical Bonds: A case Study on Multiple-model Use in Grade II Chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 84, 353-381. 2010.

[14]. M. S. Park Eun Jung, “Student Perception and Conceptual Development as Represented by Student Mental Models of Atomic Structure. Published Dissertation, Ohio State University, United States. 2006.

[15]. P. M. Sadler, Psychometric Models of Student Conceptions in Science; Reconciling Qualitative Studies and Distractor-driven Assessment Instruments, 2008. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 265-296.

[16]. D. H. Jonassen, Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall, 2000.

[17]. W. Gerace, “Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding”. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference PERC Publishing, Rochester, NY. 2001.

[18]. C. F. Bauer, “Attitude Toward Chemistry: A Semantic Differential Instrument for Assessing Curriculum Impacts, 2008. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(10), 1440.

[19]. J. Bransford, Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and be able to Do. 2012. https:// books. google.com.ph/books.

[20]. C.D. Resullar, “Assessment of Student Misconception on Basic Concepts of Measurement and Matter: Suggested Activities for Conceptual Change. Master’s Thesis, Ateneo de manila University, 2004.