International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications (2456-9992)

High Quality Publications & World Wide Indexing!

Community-Based Assessment Of Forest Provisioning Ecosystem Services In The Northern Vietnam

Volume 4 - Issue 1, January 2020 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Thi Phuong Mai Nguyen, Thi Dong Nguyen
community-based assessment; forest provisioning ecosystem services; local demands; local supply; Vietnam-north.
Local communities - as direct users and managers of ecosystems - acutely do know about the provisioning services of forests in their area. Their assessment can support policy-making and strengthen the capacity to manage forest ecosystem services and natural resources at the local scale. Hence, the research investigates local people’s demands for forest provisioning ecosystem services (FPES), and their evaluation of the resource supply that contributes to their well-being. Methods of data collection are group discussions and household interviews in some villages in the Northern Vietnam. The research illustrates that local people have high demands concerning FPES for domestic use purposes, especially, requirements of timber for stilt - house building, fuel wood and water supply. Although the local demands have changed over time, these services are still of major concern while the supplies were evaluated to be at low level and limited in quantity and quality. Local people highly appreciated the role of forests to their income and their daily lives which indicates their considerable dependence on forests. Based on local people’s assessment and awareness of FPES, policy makers and managers could be enabled to perform more effective targeting and forest management interventions.
[1] C. Albert, A. Bonn, B. Burkhard, et al, “Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: Insights from Germany” Journal of Ecological Indicators. 61(September), p. 38-48, 2015.

[2] B. Burkhard, M. Kandziora, Y. Hou, and F. Müller. “Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands - Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification.” Landscape Online. 34(1), p.1-32, 2014.

[3] J. W. Creswell, “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, USA, 1997.

[4] I. R. Geijzendorffer, B. Martín-López, and P. K. Roche, “Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments”, Ecological Indicators. 52, p. 320-331, 2015.

[5] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2003.

[6] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), Ecosystem and Human Well-being (vol 1) Current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.

[7] M. Schröter, R. P. Remme, and L. Hein “How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes?” Ecological Indicators. 23, p.220-221, 2012.

[8] UNEP, "Ecosystem Services Indicators: Gaps, Opportunities, and Next Steps. Expert Workshop on Ecosystem Service