IJARP SJIF(2018): 4.908

International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications!

Promoting Educational Research Through Effective Instrument Development

Volume 3 - Issue 3, March 2019 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Author(s)
Matthew Cyril
Keywords
Educational Research, Instrument Development, Item Analysis, Test Development Models, Test theories.
Abstract
The paper examined various processes of instrument development and projected two models: Test Development Model (TDM) I and TDM II for effective instrument development in educational research. Methods of establishing validity (Face, Content and Construct) and reliability (Test Re-test, Split Half, Cronbach Alfa and Coefficient of Concordance) of research instruments were equally highlighted. Two test theories: Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) were identified as significant theories associated with test development. The two statistics which form the cornerstone of classical test theory (item difficulty and item discrimination) for establishing item facility indexes (Item Analysis) were also examined. Finally, the processes provided by the two models for instrument development projected in this paper as well as the two test theories which provide the logic and mathematical framework that underlie standard practices in test construction and use were recommended for the development of test instrument in educational research. Also, is recommended that only items found within the acceptable difficulty index and discrimination index should be retained to form final part of the developed instrument.
References
[1]. A. Ali, Conducting research in education and the social sciences. Tashiwa Networks Ltd 2006.

[2]. L. A. Althouse, “Test development: Ten steps to a valid and reliable certification exam” 2003. Available: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings [Accessed September 7, 2015]

[3]. Akujo, C. C. & George, C. C. (2010). Assessment of technological work skills required by Marketing education graduates in the world of work. Nigerian vocational association journal, 15(1), 206 – 213

[4]. G. U. Anene, O. G. Ndubuisi, Educational measurement and evaluation: Theory and practice. University Trust Publishers, Nsukka Enugu State, Nigeria. 2015

[5]. E. U. Anyakoha, Development research skills, concepts and conceptual framework. Nsukka: Great AP express publishers ltd 2009.

[6]. C. Boopathiraji, K. Chellamani, “Analysis of test items on difficulty level and Discrimination index in the test for research in education”. International journal of social Science and interdisciplinary research. 2(2), 189-193, 2013

[7]. L. Crocker, J. Algina, Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning USA 2008

[8]. M. Cyril, Development of test models for instruments in educational research. Lambert Academic Publishing 17 Mldrum Street, Beau Bassin 71504, Mauritius, 2008

[9]. S. Eaves, B. Erford, “Item analysis.” 2009. Available: www.education.com/reference/ [Accessed October 24, 2013]

[10]. D. N. Ezeh, Educational measurement and evaluation: Theory and practice. University Trust Publishers, Nsukka Enugu State, Nigeria 2015.

[11]. J. Ezeugwu, “Continuous assessment mode of evaluation in UBE programme: issues of teacher quality in assessment and record-keeping.” African journal of science, technology and mathematics (AJSTME). 2(1), 129 – 138, 2012.

[12]. R. K. Hambleton, R. W. Jones, “Comparison of classical test theory and item response Theory and their applications to test development.” 1993. Available: http://www.educationalmeasurement/issues&practice, [Accessed January 13, 2015]

[13]. R. K. Hambleton, Principles and selected applications of item response theory. New York: Macmillan, 1989

[14]. J. Izard, Trial testing and item analysis in test construction. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, 1997.

[15]. M. I. Izukanne, Educational psychology in measurement and evaluation. University of Nigeria press Ltd, 2008.

[16]. M. I. Junaidu, “Education, National Security and Economic Empowerment: a re-appraisal.” Keynote address at the 5th Annual Conference of the Faculty of Education, UDUS 5th -8th November 2018.

[17]. K. A. Korb, “Calculating reliability of quantitative measures.” 2014. Available: www.real-statistics.com/reliability/kuder-richardson-formula-20 [Accessed: November 11, 2013]

[18]. S. Matlock-Hetzel, “Basic concepts in item and test analysis.” 1997. Available: http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/Espy.htm [Accessed: October 26, 2013].

[19]. M. McAlpine, “A summary of methods of item analysis.” 2002. Available: www.caacentre.ac.uk/dldocs [Accessed: October 26, 2013].

[20]. D. B. McCoach, R. K. Gable, J. P. Madura, J. P. “Review of the steps for designing an instrument.” 2013. Available: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/ [Accessed: July 9, 2015].

[21]. J. Millman, J. Greene, The specification and development of tests of achievement and Ability. New York: Macmillan, 1989.

[22]. B. G. Nworgu, Educational measurement and evaluation. Theory and practice. University Trust Publishers Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria, 2015.

[23]. B. G. Nworgu, Educational research. Basic issues and methodology. University Trust Publishers Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria, 2015

[24]. A. O. Olayiwola, Procedures in educational research. Kongo (Nig.) Ltd. NN6 Lokoja Road/Lagos street Kaduna, 2010.

[25]. K. N. “Qualitative research methods and educational planning.” 2005. Available: http://www.unesco.org [Accessed: March 15, 2013].

[26]. A.A. Sambo, Research methods in education. Stirling – Horden publishers (Nig.) Ltd Lagos, 2008

[27]. B. Thompson, J. E. Levitov, “Using microcomputers to score and evaluate test items.” Collegiate Microcomputer, 3, 163-168, 1985.

[28]. R. M. Thorndike, G. K. Cunningham, R. L. Thorndike, E. P. Hagen, Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. New York: MacMillan, 1991.

[29]. R. L. Thorndike, E. P. Hagen, Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1969.