Evaluating The Resource Supply Thresholds That Trigger Livestock Movement Leading To Grazing Conflicts In Northern Kenya
Volume 2 - Issue 7, July 2018 Edition
[Download Full Paper]
Author(s)
Dominic Maringa, Mworia Mugambi, Gichuki Nathan, Elis Njoka, Edward Ouko
Keywords
Grazing conflicts, mixed-method approach, MODIS, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI),
Abstract
Grazing conflicts in Northern Kenya is causing critical scenario that is drawing the attention of many stakeholders, communities and Governments alike. The objective of this study was to find out the thresholds of grazing resources throughout the year in the Community conservancies, and how these contribute to livestock movements in search of grazing resources. The study used an integrated Mixed-Method approach of experimental and social survey designs to assess how competition for limited resource triggers intra and inter-conservancy conflicts. In this study a total of eight experimental plots measuring 50mx50m were set up, two in each of the three community-owned conservancies, and two in a private conservancy to assess forage availability during dry and wet seasons. The privately owned conservancy acted as the control. Clip-dry-and-weigh method was used to assess forage capacities. Five samples of Clippings were obtained using 0.5mx0.5m wire quadrant randomly distributed in each plot in both seasons. Visual estimates were used to assess ground cover percentages while grass height and weight measurements were taken to assess biomass characteristics. We found that the months of June to October had the lowest forage availability. Through use of Remote Sensing we found that there are general decline in vegetation vigour during the period of January-March, and June to October when most grazing conflicts are experienced, and through Participatory GIS (PGIS) the respondents attested that this has been the cause of movements to unknown areas in search of browsable forage. It was found out that there is a close correlation between grazing conflicts and water and forage availability in the study area.
References
[1]. Creswell, JW; & Plano-Clark,(2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research. Vol.2 2nd Ed
[2]. Dennis Herlocker. (1992). Survey Method for Classification of Range Condition.(Range Monitoring Series No.1).In: Shaaban. B & Dierk.W (edt). Range management Handbook of Kenya Vol III .7. Ministry of Livestock Development. Range Management Division. Nairobi. Kenya
[3]. Ericksen P, et al. (2011). Mapping and valuing ecosystem services in the Ewaso Ng’iro Watershed. ILRI
[4]. Jatzold.R.(1995); Climatology of Northern and North East Kenya. In Range Management Handbook of Kenya Vol.11. Ministry of Livestock and Marketing.
[5]. Kaye-Zwiebel, E., & E.King. (2014). Kenyan pastoralist societies in transition: Varying perceptions of the value of ecosystem services. Ecology and Society: 19 (3). 17
[6]. Le Heoroeu & Hoste, 1977. Rangeland Production and Annual Rainfall Relations in the Mediterranean Basin and in the African Sahelo-Sudanian Zone. Journal of Range Management. 30 (3). May 1977
[7]. Siri Ericksen, et al. 2011. When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Journal of Climate and Development, Vol 3, Issue 1, 2011.
[8]. Thurow, T. L., and Herlocker, D.J. (1993). Range Management Handbook of Kenya, Volume III, 5. Users Guide for the Range Management Handbook of Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock development and Marketing, Range Management Division/ Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Nairobi.
[9]. Trollope W & Trollope A. (1999). Report of assessment of range condition and the fire of the savanna vegetation on the LEWA Downs Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya-1998. Alice: University of Fort Hare.
