International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications (2456-9992)

High Quality Publications & World Wide Indexing!

An Instructional Action Learning Model for Strengthening Business Students’ English Learning Community

Volume 3 - Issue 10, October 2019 Edition
[Download Full Paper]

Ling Li
Action Learning , Learning Community, Team Learning, Instructional Model
Chinese business Students are encountering increasing challenges in utilizing English in learning the international frontier information related to their majors. Engaging students in establishing their own learning communities can be a better alternative for traditional learning methods.By proposing an instructional action learning model, this paper discusses the framework for strengthening business students’ English learning community. The proposed model -- 5P Action Learning Cycle (5PALC) consists of five stages in alignment with five intervention methods: preparation (coaching), planning (goal-setting), participation (dialogue), presentation (team learning), and peer & self assessment (appreciative inquiry). 5PALC could promote team learning and dialogical communication among students, which empowered business students and gave them a higher level of sustainable leadership.
[1] R.W Revans, “What is action learning?”. Journal of management development, 1(3), pp.64-75. 1982.

[2] R.W. Revans, “Action Learning: The forces of achievement, or getting it done.” Management Decision, 21(3), pp.44-54, 1983.

[3] R.W. Revans, The ABC of Action Learning, Lemos and Crane, London, 1998.
[4] M. Pedler, Action learning in practice, Gower Publishing, Hampshire, 1997.

[5] Adamson, B. (2011). Embedding assessment for learning. In Assessment reform in education (pp. 197-203). Springer, Dordrecht.

[6] Aoki, N. & Smith, R. C. (1996). Autonomy in Cultural Context: the case of Japan. Paper presented at AILA 1996, Jyvakyla, Finland.

[7] Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method. and practice. MA: Addison-Wesley.

[8] Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and Double-loop Models in research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363- 375.

[9] Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[10] Argyris, C. (1983). Action science and intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9. 115-140.

[11] Argyris, C. (1983). Action science and intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9. 115-140.

[12] Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley.

[13] Atkinson, D. (Ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Taylor & Francis.

[14] Barge, J. K. (2002). Enlarging the meaning of group deliberation: From discussion to dialogue. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 159-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[15] Belbin, R.M. (1981). Management Teams: Why they Succeed or Fail. London, Heinemann: in press.

[16] Benson, P. (1996). Concepts of autonomy in language learning. In R. Pemberton, E. S. Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 27-33). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

[17] Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.

[18] Blankstein, A. (2004). Failure is Not an Option. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

[19] Bourner, T. & Frost, P. (1996). In their own words: the experience of action learning in higher education. Education + Training, 38(8), 22-31.

[20] Brooks, A., & Watkins, K. E. (1994). A new era for action technologies: A look at the issues. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 63, 5-16.

[21] Brophy, J. (2010). Classroom management as socializing students into clearly articulated roles. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 45(1), 41-45.

[22] Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

[23] Coghlan, D. (2010). Seeking common ground in the diversity and diffusion of action research and collaborative management research action modalities: Toward a general empirical method. In Research in organizational change and development (pp. 149-181). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

[24] Cohen, M. & Sproull, L. (Eds.). (1996). Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[25] Cooperrider, D. (1986) Appreciative Inquiry: Toward a Methodology for Understanding and Enhancing Organizational Innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Organiational Behavior, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

[26] Cooperrider, D., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in organizational change and development, 1(1), 129-169.

[27] Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D. & Stavros, J.M. (2008) Appreciative Inquiry Handbook (2nd Ed.) Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing.

[28] Cummings, T.G. & Worley, C.G. (2008). Organization Development and Change (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

[29] Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy 3: from Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.

[30] Dam, L. (2006). Developing learner autonomy: Looking into learners’ logbooks. In M. Kötter, O. Traxel & S. Gabel (Eds.), Investigating and facilitating language learning (pp. 265-282). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

[31] Dam, L. (2011). Developing Learner Autonomy with School Kids: Principles, practices, results. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 5-16). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

[32] Dam, L., & Legenhausen, L. (2011). Explicit reflection, evaluation, and assessment in the autonomy classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 177-189.

[33] Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (2nd ed.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.

[34] Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.

[35] Dewey, J. (1990). The child and curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[36] Dotlich, D. & Noel, J. (1998). Action learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[37] Dufour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices For Enhancing Student Achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

[38] Dunlap, J. C., & Grabinger, S. (2003). Preparing students for lifelong learning: A review of instructional features and teaching methodologies. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(2), 6-25.

[39] Eaker, R., DuFour, R., & Burnette, R. (2002). Getting started: A conceptual framework for creating a professional learning community. Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities, 1-8.

[40] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

[41] Frank, H.D. (1996). The use of action learning in British higher education. Education & Training, 38(8), 7-15.

[42] Galbraith, M. W. (Ed.). (1991). Facilitating adult learning: A transactional process. Krieger Publishing Company.

[43] Garratt, B. (1991). The power of action learning. In M. Pedler (Ed.), Action learning in practice (pp. 45-61). Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

[44] Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. The handbook of second language acquisition, 27.
[45] Gregory, M. (1994). Accrediting work-based learning: action learning–a model for empowerment. Journal of Management Development, 13(4), 41-52.

[46] Gremmo, M. J. & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151–164.

[47] Grima, A. C. (2000). Learning to learn. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 351-353). London: Routledge.

[48] Ho, J. & Crookall, D. (1995). Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: learner autonomy in English language teaching. System, 23(2), 235-243.

[49] Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literature. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.

[50] Huber, G. (1996). Organizational learning: a guide for executives in technology–critical organizations. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7-8), 821-832.
[51] Isaacs, W. N. (1993). Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 24-39.

[52] Kohonen, V. (2003). Student autonomy and teachers’ professional growth: Fostering a collegial culture in language teacher education. In D. Little, J. Ridley, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom (pp. 147-159). Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.

[53] Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning-style inventory: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. TRG Hay/McBer.

[54] Kolb, D. A. (2000). The process of experiential learning. In Strategic learning in a knowledge economy (pp. 313-331). Butterworth-Heinemann.

[55] Legenhausen, L. (2003). Second language acquisition in an autonomous learning environment. In D. Little, J. Ridley & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment (pp.65-77). Dublin: Authentik.

[56] Legenhausen, L. (2011). The Place of Grammar in an Autonomous Classroom: Issues and research results. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 5-16). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

[57] Lenning, O., & Ebbers, L. (1999). The powerful potential of learning communities: Improving education for the future. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26(6), Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.

[58] Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 319-338.

[59] Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

[60] Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.

[61] Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.

[62] Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: Some steps along the way. In Mäkinen, K., P. Kaikkonen & V. Kohonen (Eds.), Future perspectives in foreign language education. Oulu: Publications of the Faculty of Education in Oulu University, 101, 15-25.

[63] Little, D., Dam, L., & Legenhausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Multilingual Matters.

[64] Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.

[65] Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational behavior and human performance, 3(2), 157-189.

[66] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

[67] Lu, L. H. (2015, July). Soaring Towards Positive Change: Reflection on an Action Research Case in Double Loop Learning Process. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome. 2 (2).

[68] Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1), 1-15.

[69] Marquardt, M. & Waddill, D. (2010). The power of learning in action learning: a conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1(2), 185-202.

[70] Marquardt, M. (2004). Optimizing the Power of Action Learning: Solving Problems and Building Leaders in Real Time. Palo Alto, Califomia: Davies-Black Publishing.

[71] Marsick, V. J., & O’Neil, J. (1999). The many faces of action learning. Management learning, 30(2), 159-176.

[72] Merriam, S. B. & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in Adulthood (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[73] Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of educational psychology, 88(2), 203.

[74] Mohamadpour, P. (2013). Realization of autonomy and English language proficiency among Iranian high school students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (7), 1187-1193.

[75] Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL quarterly, 35(2), 307-322.

[76] O’Hara, S., Webber, T., & Reeve, S. (1996). Action learning in management education. Education+ Training, 38(8), 16-21.

[77] O'Neil, J., & Marsick, V. J. (2007). Understanding action learning: Theory into practice. New York: American Management Association.

[78] Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL quarterly, 29(1), 9-31.

[79] Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[80] Revans, R. (1978). Action learning takes a health cure. Education+ Training, 20(10), 295-299.

[81] Revans, R. (1984). Action Learning: Are we getting there? Management Decision, 22(1), 45-52.

[82] Revans, R. (1998). The ABC of action learning. London: Lemos and Crane.

[83] Rigg, C., & Richards, S. (Eds.). (2006). Action learning, leadership and organizational development in public services. New York, NY: Routledge.

[84] Rivers, W. P. (2001). Autonomy at all costs: An ethnography of metacognitive self-assessment and self-management among experienced language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 279–290.

[85] Rogoff, B., Bartlett, L., & Turkanis, C. G. (2001). Lessons about learning as a community. In B. Rogoff, C. G. Turkanis & L. Bartlett (Eds.), Learning together: Children and adults in a school community (pp. 3-17). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

[86] Ross, R. (1994). Skillful Discussion. In P. Senge et al. (Eds.). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization (pp.387-393). New York: Doubleday.

[87] Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (1), 41-51.

[88] Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L. & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256.

[89] Schein, E. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 40-51.

[90] Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1976). Group processes in the classroom. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

[91] Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (2001). Group processes in the classroom (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

[92] Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith

[93] Schön, D.A. (1987). Jossey-Bass higher education series. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

[94] Senge, P. (1995). On schools as learning organizations: A conversation with Peter Senge. Educational Leadership (April). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[95] Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

[96] Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

[97] Senge, P. M. (1997). The fifth discipline. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(3), 46-51.

[98] Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (1994). The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

[99] Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[100] Shamir, A. (2013). Cognitive education in the digital age: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 96-107.

[101] Sirotnik, K. A. (1998). Ecological images of change: Limits and possibilities. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change, roots of educational change (pp.181-197) Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[102] Smith, B., & Dodds, B. (1997). Developing managers in the project-oriented organization. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(5), 165-170.

[103] Spolsky, B. (1989). Communicative competence, language proficiency, and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 138-156.

[104] Stephens, J. C. & Graham, A. C. (2008). Climate science to citizen action: Energizing nonformal climate science education. EOS, 89(22), 204-205.

[105] Swain, M. (1981). Time and timing in bilingual education. Language Learning, 31, 1-6.

[106] Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (1999). Integrating classroom context into motivation theory and research: Rationales, methods, and implications. Advances in motivation and achievement, 11, 87-121.

[107] Victori, M. & Lockart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.

[108] Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.

[109] Walton, D. (1999). One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

[110] Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.

[111] Weiss, P. (2004). The three levels of coaching. Organisational Psychology Master's Programme Handbook. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cape Town.

[112] Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.

[113] Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 32-55.

[114] Whitmore, J. (1992). Coaching for Performance. London: Nicholas Bearley .

[115] Wilson, C. (2001). Faculty attitudes about distance learning. Educause Quarterly, 24(2), 70-71.

[116] Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. U.S.: Basic Books.

[117] Yorks, L. (2005). Action learning as a vehicle for management development and organizational learning. In C. Wankel & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Educating managers through real world projects (pp. 183-211). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

[118] Yorks, L., O'Neil, J., & Marsick, V. J. (1999). Action learning theoretical bases and varieties of practice. Advances in developing human resources, 1(2), 1-18.

[119] Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Farquhar, M. (2002). Action learning, action research and process management (ALARPM): A personal history. The Learning Organization, 9(3), 102-113.

[120] Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Passfield, R. (2016). History and culture of ALARA–the Action Learning and Action Research Association. Educational Action Research, 24(1), 65-76.